PROTECTION NEWS

BELOW YOU WILL FIND NEWS LINKS RELATED TO THE PROTECTION INDUSTRY

TOP

Seattle man could face charges in Blackwater case

Federal prosecutors in Seattle are awaiting word from the Department of Justice to decide whether to indict a former Blackwater USA security operator now living in Seattle for the Christmas Eve 2006 shooting death of the bodyguard of the Iraqi vice president.

The case is not connected with the shooting involving six Blackwater contractors in a crowded Baghdad square in September 2007 that left 17 civilians dead.

According to congressional testimony and news accounts, Seattle resident Andrew Moonen was working an as armorer in the protected Green Zone in Baghdad and had been drinking at a Christmas party when he passed through a gate near the residence of Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki and was confronted by a guard.

According to a memorandum issued last year by the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Moonen fired several shots. The Iraqi, identified as 32-year-old Raheem Khalif, was hit three times and died. Khalif was assigned to the protection detail of Vice President Adil Abd-al-Mahdi.

The shooting was one of several highlighted by congressional investigators concerned about a series of questionable incidents involving the use of deadly force by private security operators in Iraqis. The Moonen incident was widely publicized after a September 2007 incident in which Blackwater operators opened fire on a group of Iraqis.

Moonen, a former Army Ranger with the 82nd Airborne Division, was fired by Blackwater for violating policy about being armed while intoxicated.

U.S. Attorney Jeff Sullivan, whose Seattle office has conducted the investigation because Moonen lives here, said his prosecutors have submitted memos and other information to the DOJ for review before he decides whether to seek an indictment against Moonen.

Moonen's Seattle defense attorney has questioned whether the U.S. government has jurisdiction to prosecute Moonen for an incident that happened halfway around the world. Moreover, he said there are factual issues in dispute, such as whether Moonen was acting in self-defense.

Information from Seattle Times archives and staff reporter Mike Carter is included in this report.

Copyright © 2008 The Seattle Times Company

Red Hand Pointing Up
BACK TO TOP

Bodyguard to the Holy? Mother Teresa’s Bodyguard

I’ve heard of “Bodyguard to the Stars” but what about “Bodyguard to the Holy“?

Here’s an interesting tidbit in bodyguard lore. Apparently Mother Teresa had a bodyguard on occasion. His name is James Alan Murphy and it seems he’s quite the man of adventure. Besides serving as a bodyguard for Mother Teresa, he was a salvage diver and charter boat captain.

I’ve never protected any religious figures but I know I’ve done my fair share of praying while on a protective detail especially that something doesn’t go wrong.

baalex @ November 21, 2008  http://www.executive-protection-news.com

Red Hand Pointing Up
BACK TO TOP

Why does this man need a bodyguard?

NFL players are taking security precautions after murders, beatings and robberies
Reuters-Published: Thursday, November 20, 2008

MIAMI -- Frightened NFL players are carrying guns and hiring bodyguards as they seek to avoid becoming victims of violent crime which has already claimed the lives of two players.Seven players told the latest edition of ESPN The Magazine, to be published on Friday, that the murders last year of Washington Redskins safety Sean Taylor and Denver Broncos defensive back Darrent Williams, had raised the alarm among some of the country's toughest sportsmen."We are targets. We need to be aware of that everywhere we go," said Tampa Bay Buccaneers corner Ronde Barber.NFL Players Association president and Tennessee Titans lineman Kevin Mawae says about half of his teammates own weapons for security.

Taylor was shot during a botched robbery at his home in South Florida while Williams was shot and killed outside a nightclub in Denver on New Year's Eve 2007.This year, Oakland receiver Javon Walker was robbed and beaten unconscious in Las Vegas and Jacksonville Jaguars lineman Richard Collier had to have his leg amputated after being shot and left paralyzed below the waist.

The response has been an escalation in security for the players and NFL Players Association president Kevin Mawae, of the Tennessee Titans, estimates about half his teammates carry guns.

"If I had to guess about our locker room, I'd say it's 50-50 when it comes to gun ownership," he told the magazine."I don't own a handgun. I have a hunting rifle. My job is to protect my family. If someone comes into my house? Game's on," he said.

Fred Taylor, a Jaguars teammate of Collier, said that not being able to carry guns at the team's facility makes him feel vulnerable."I have all the security measures at my house -- systems, cameras, I can watch everything from my computer, but I still don't think I have enough. Who knows what is enough?" he said.

"League officials tell us we need to take measures to protect ourselves. But the NFL says we can't have guns in the team facility -- even in the parking lot. Crooks know this."They can just sit back and wait for us to drive off, knowing we won't have anything in our vehicle from point A to point B."

Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger told the magazine that he now has a bodyguard with him at all times.
"The one time I was scared the most, I didn't have anybody with me. I don't want to relive all the details, but this guy brandished a weapon in my face," he said. "I kept my cool and talked my way out of it. People showed up and helped get rid of the guy. That's when I decided to have someone with me all the time."

Houston Texans corner Dunta Robinson suffered an armed robbery at his home, having a gun pointed in his face and being tied up, and says that was proof that even stay-at-home players, not just those who enjoy nightlife, can be at risk.
"It was the scariest moment of my life," he said. "You hear lots of stories of guys getting robbed and you say, 'Man, what were they doing, how did they get into that situation? Flashy guys. Rude guys, guys who act like they're better than everyone. I don't roll like that, and it still happened to me."

Big salaries, high profiles, and with easily available travel schedules make the players easy targets, but Dave Abrams, appointed as head of Denver's security following the murder of Williams, worries their families may soon be prayed upon.
"What's the next layer? Wives and children: a kid kidnapped for ransom, or some other kind of craziness. I'm scared to death that's where criminals perceive the next vulnerability is for our players: their families."

© The Vancouver Province 2008

Red Hand Pointing Up
BACK TO TOP

Top 10 Secret Service Code Names

Time Magazine online recently published a list of the
Top 10 code names used by the secret service.

1) Obama-"Renegade"

2) JFK-"Lancer"

3) Nixon-"Searchlight"

4) Jimmy Carter-"Deacon"

5) Edward Kennedy-"Sunburn"

6) Reagan-"Rawhide"

7) Pope John Paul II-"Halo"

8) Kareena Gore, daughter of former VP Al Gore-"Smurfette"

9) Cheney-"Angler"

10) Cindy Mcain-"Parasol"

Red Hand Pointing Up
BACK TO TOP

Can Guns-for-Hire (Private Security Firms) Really Deter Pirates?

John Harris, the CEO of HollowPoint Protective Services , is in the business of maritime security and anti-piracy operations. And he tells DANGER ROOM his company has seen a surge in calls from shipping companies that ply the Gulf of Aden, where dozens of ships have been attacked by Somali pirates.Over the past few weeks, he said, HollowPoint "started receiving a lot of e-mails from shipping companies -- they had questions, and they wanted to talk."
In fact, he added,"I just got an e-mail today from another company that operates in the
Gulf of Aden."
HollowPoint provides a range of services, from security details to training and consultation. The company also offers covert security teams that could blend in with a ship's crew. While Harris would not give specifics about his clients or their protection package (HollowPoint is a small outfit compared to aspiring pirate-fighters Blackwater), he said a couple of companies "were in the final stages" of contracting for services. Shipping officials have also called for naval blockade of the Somali coast. But according to Harris, sending naval vessels to patrol 2,400 miles of coastline would be a poor remedy. "The only way to successfully deter that operation is to put people on board the boat," he tells DANGER ROOM.
Pirate boarding parties on small boats may elude a naval blockade, Harris argued, but they can also be repelled. "My perception all along has been – It’s all about a show of force," he said. "They [pirates] are looking for something they can pick off and move on to the next target."Somali pirates are also getting wise to naval tactics. In a discussion yesterday of piracy at the Heritage Foundation, Dominick Donald, chief analyst with UK security firm Aegis offered an interesting explanation of why piracy has spiked in the Gulf of Aden.

I think the pirates have worked out what it is they can get away with. they've worked out the extent of naval capabilities; they've worked out the extent of what navies are permitted to do; and they've adapted. they've found out that the 25-nautical-mile-wide shipping lane off the eastern littoral of Somalia wasn't that good of a target-rich environment: A lot of the vessels might have been a bit difficult to reach, but they weren't tramping up and down with great frequency. The Gulf of Aden, on the other hand, you're talking about perhaps 20,000 vessels a year -- 80 to 100 vessels a day. If these pirates are essentially opportunistic, all you need to do is park your mothership out at some point in the Gulf of Aden where you know there is a shipping lane and wait for a suitable target to come along.

Sending naval ships, Donald added, may not deter such attacks. "There is, in reality, only a 15-minute window in which naval forces can actually use lethal force against a pirate," he said. "And that is the 15 minutes between when the watch-keeper on the bridge of the commercial vessels says, 'We're being attacked by pirates,' and the point at which the pirates take control of the bridge."Granted, Aegis is also in the business of selling private security. But Donald's argument squares with what Harris seems to be suggesting. So will shipping firms start hiring security agents in serious numbers? Perhaps not yet. In his presentation, Donald said he did not see any "systematic" push to hire armed escorts for merchant vessels, especially tankers. "At the moment, tanker vessels absolutely will not carry armed escorts on board; they will not carry any firearms; they don't like armed sailors -- naval personnel -- on board, let alone private security operators.
And the downstream legal implications of hiring private security are really pretty substantial," he said.
Individual charterers -- who want to escort one cargo, on one ship -- may, however, be in the market for such services, Donald added.  

Red Hand Pointing Up
BACK TO TOP

Foreign Civilian Security Contractors Disappearing

November 25, 2008: The United States is rapidly replacing foreign contractors in Iraq with Iraqis. Currently, about half the 163,000 civilian contractors there are locals. Some 28,000 are Americans, with the rest coming from dozens of different countries. The U.S. wants to have  most of the contractors hired locally as soon as possible. This will save the United States a lot of money, as the Iraqis will be paid according to prevailing wages in Iraq. That's less than half what most of the foreign contractors are paid.

The new Status of Forces agreement (which determines what U.S. troops can do, and who will prosecute those who misbehave) takes immunity (from the local legal system) away from the contractors. The U.S. has Status of Forces agreements in all countries where American troops are stationed. In Iraq, the only problem will be for VIP security details, who are liable to get into gun battles with attackers when there are civilians about, and it's uncertain if Iraqi courts could be fair and unprejudiced. This may get interesting, as the VIP bodyguards can get good jobs in other parts of the world, but the VIPs don't want to go unprotected in a place like Iraq. 

Contractors are used by the military because they are cheaper than soldiers. This is especially true in Iraq, where most of the contractors are unskilled labor from countries with very low pay scales. These civilians still make several times what they could back home, if they could find a job back home. Foreigners were hired initially because it was too dangerous to hire Iraqis. First, there was the loyalty problem, and then there was the risk of terrorists threatening, or killing, Iraqis working on American bases. There were some Iraqis working on those bases, mainly interpreters and some key specialists. And these Iraqis faced constant danger from terrorists. This policy greatly reduced the terrorist attacks inside American bases. There were only a few in over five years, all carried out by Iraqis who had access to the bases.

For the contractors, there is some danger in Iraq, but the chances of getting killed or wounded were a third of the rate for the troops, and the troops had a casualty rate that was about a third of what it was for previous wars (like Vietnam). Moreover, in the last year, combat casualties among foreign contractors has come way down, to, like, hardly any.

Armies have always had civilians along, to perform support functions. The historical term is "camp followers." In times past, the ratio of civilians to soldiers was often much higher, like eight civilians for every one soldier. Only the most disciplined armies (like the ancient Romans at their peak), kept the ratio closer to one to one. That's the same ratio U.S. troops currently have, although it was more like 90 civilians for every hundred troops during the Surge Offensive last year.

When conscript armies became common in the 19th century, it was suddenly cheaper to replace many of those civilians with conscripts (who were paid a nominal wage.) Now that armies are going all-volunteer, it's reverting to the old days, where it was cheaper to have civilians perform a lot of support jobs.

In Iraq, most of the civilian contractors work in the well defended bases, and most of the contractor casualties are among those (about a quarter of the total) who do security or transportation jobs that take them outside the wire. But even those have a lower casualty rate than the combat troops. For the really dangerous work, the troops are used. But working in a combat zone is still dangerous, no matter what your work clothes look like.

Red Hand Pointing Up
BACK TO TOP

Close to 4,000 Officers from Across U.S. to Work Obama Inauguration

Posted: November 27th, 2008 09:23 AM GMT-05:00
ANDREW MAYKUTH
The Philadelphia Inquirer

About 290 Philadelphia police officers will get a front-row view of President-elect Barack Obama's Jan. 20 inaugural festivities.
Police Commissioner Charles H. Ramsey has agreed to send 250 officers and 40 supervisors to help Washington law enforcement officials manage crowds expected to exceed 1.5 million for Obama's swearing-in ceremonies.
During an orientation yesterday at the Philadelphia Police Academy, some volunteers chosen for the assignment began filling out the paperwork required to become temporarily deputized as U.S. marshals for the duration of the event.
Washington Police Chief Cathy L. Lanier told reporters that she planned to nearly double the Metropolitan Police Department's force with 4,000 officers from 93 jurisdictions across the country.
The outside agencies are expected to be assigned responsibility for crowd control along sections of the parade route, said Philadelphia Deputy Police Commissioner Stephen Johnson Sr. He said the Philadelphia contingent might also be assigned to manage security at one of the inaugural balls.
Ramsey, who as Lanier's predecessor in Washington managed the 2001 and 2005 inaugurals, said the inaugural organizers would reimburse Philadelphia for the cost of transporting, housing, feeding and paying the officers on the three-day assignment.
"They're going to get enormous crowds for this one," Ramsey said. While the commissioner won't be part of the department's contingent, he said, he plans to travel to Washington for the inaugural, to appear on a television station there as an unpaid commentator on security preparations.
The officers who are part of the contingent were selected by supervisors from among 500 who responded to a call for volunteers, Ramsey said.
The officers will be bused to Washington on Jan. 18 and sworn in on Jan. 19, when they will receive their assignments. The Secret Service is the lead law enforcement agency handling security.
"It's complicated just because of the sheer size of the contingent," said Johnson, who also sent 75 officers to the Republican National Convention in Minnesota in September.
"It's a historic occasion, and the huge crowds that are expected are going to be the biggest challenge," Johnson said.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Copyright 2008 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Red Hand Pointing Up
BACK TO TOP

Row over Rabin killer interview

Leading Israelis have condemned interviews by two televisions channels with the man who assassinated Israel's former Prime Minister, Yitzhak Rabin. Short versions of the first interviews ever done from Yigal Amir's prison cell ran on Israeli television on Thursday.

Amir has been moved to solitary confinement and denied telephone use and conjugal visits as punishment. The ultra-nationalist Jew, who opposed the Oslo peace process, has shown no remorse for shooting Rabin in 1995.

The telephone interviews were conducted without the knowledge of the prison service. Excerpts were broadcast on Israel's Channel Two and Channel 10 on Thursday evening, a few days ahead of the 4 November anniversary of the killing. But after widespread criticism, both channels later cancelled plans to run longer versions of the interview on Friday evening.

Deal 'a disaster'

In the interviews, Amir says his decision was influenced by the opinions of military figures at the time, including former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon. "All the military experts said that the Oslo Accord was a disaster," Amir said, referring to the 1993 accords under which Israel agreed to cede control of parts of the West Bank to the Palestinians.

Rabin signed the deal with Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat. Amir also said he began considering the idea when he saw Rabin at a wedding with only one bodyguard:

"I saw that it was so easy, and told myself that in several years I would regret not having killed him." Defence Minister Ehud Barak was among those politicians and commentators who condemned the channels' actions.

"Yigal Amir ought to wither in prison for the rest of his life and he should under no condition be part of the mediatised public debate," he said in a statement. Amir, who is serving a life sentence, has been quoted in occasional written interviews and there has been one case where he was briefly questioned in television footage.

Asked by a reporter during one of his courtroom appearances if he had any regrets about the assassination, he replied: "Yes.... Why didn't I do it earlier?" The granting of permission for conjugal visits by Amir's wife, who he married secretly while in jail, has also been a controversial issue in Israel.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/middle_east/7701649.stm

Published: 2008/10/31 15:05:21 GMT

Red Hand Pointing Up
BACK TO TOP

Blackwater offers to protect ships from pirates

Jeff Bliss
Bloomberg News /
Friday, October 17, 2008


Blackwater Worldwide, whose security guards came under scrutiny after a 2007 fatal shootout in Iraq, is looking to the high seas to expand business, marketing its security services to shippers plagued by pirates.

Blackwater is in talks with several companies about protecting ships travelling through the Gulf of Aden between Yemen and Somalia, where piracy is increasing, said officials of the Moyock, N.C.-based company.

"We have the capability to assist" shipping companies, said Bill Mathews, Blackwater executive vice-president.

He and other company leaders are former Navy SEALs. Ship security "is kind of what we did for a living" before joining Blackwater, he said.

Blackwater is offering the MV MacArthur, a vessel with a crew of 14 and a helicopter pad, as an escort for ships through the Gulf of Aden. The helicopters and MacArthur won't be armed, although workers will carry guns, Mathews said.

The company will need a State Department licence to sell its services to a foreign government or business, said Anne Tyrrell, a Blackwater spokesperson.

The company isn't seeking new U.S. security contracts in Iraq, where a Blackwater team was involved in the killing of 17 Iraqi civilians while guarding a State Department convoy in September 2007. The deaths are being investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

The State Department paid Blackwater more than $832 million to provide security between 2004 and 2006, about half of the money under a no-bid contract awarded in June 2004.

Security in the Gulf of Aden, which ships traverse to go through the Suez Canal, has been a growing problem. The number of attacks off the coast of Somalia jumped to 44 in 2007 from 10 in 2004, according to the International Martime Bureau. Somali pirates are holding a Ukrainian ship they hijacked last month in a bid for ransom.

© The StarPhoenix (Saskatoon) 2008

Red Hand Pointing Up
BACK TO TOP

Iraq Is Safer than Mexico

December 15, 2008: This month, about 26 people a day are dying from criminal and terrorist violence a day in Iraq. That's a bit lower than the death toll in northern Mexico, which on a bad day (like last November 3rd) saw 58 people killed. The police are generally helpless, hundreds of thousands of middle-class Mexicans have fled the border region, often to the United States (if they had dual-citizenship, which many do). Those without money must hunker down and wait for someone to win this war. The drug gangs show no signs of weakening, although the army believes that it can prevail in the next year or so.

Red Hand Pointing Up
BACK TO TOP

Protection for President Obama Proves Daunting

Posted: December 15th, 2008 03:03 PM EDTKevin Johnson
 
USA TODAYOn the historic night Barack Obama was elected president of the United States, a sobering image was lost in the euphoria of the cheering crowd in Chicago's Grant Park: Clear sheaths of bulletproof glass shielded both sides of the stage where the then-Democratic senator of Illinois declared victory.Chicago Police Superintendent Jody Weis says there were no credible threats targeting Obama that night.The glass, he says, was merely a precaution, given the enormous crowd and the high-rises looming over the sprawling outdoor venue.The scene on Nov. 4 offered a preview of the excitement and a crowd expected to top the previous inaugural high of 1.2 million in Washington when Obama takes the oath of office Jan. 20. The occasion will be a huge test for the federal and local authorities charged with protecting the new president.Obama's election shattered social and political barriers. His historic inauguration also marks a critical time for federal law enforcement officials who must -- as with every new occupant of the White House -- tailor an elaborate security plan to fit the new president and his family. In Obama's case, that involves an additional consideration: his race.Obama received Secret Service protection 18 months before the election, the earliest of any previously unprotected presidential candidate, in part because of concerns about racially charged rhetoric that had been directed at him."The fact that this is an African American is not lost on us," Secret Service spokesman Malcolm Wiley says. "We understand that this is a historic event; we understand that this is different from other inaugurations. It is one additional piece that we factor into the plan."Washington, D.C., Assistant Police Chief Patrick Burke says the crowds "will likely make this the biggest inauguration" in U.S. history. "The exuberance of that crowd in Chicago kicked us into high gear."The inaugural security plan, Burke says, will include an intelligence-gathering operation involving "the entire intelligence community."Directed by the Secret Service, the operation is designed to vet all possible threats, including those that could be posed by hate groups. The Secret Service does not discuss threats against current or past presidents.Former Secret Service agent Norm Jarvis, who was involved in the protection of four presidents, says the level of security for any president remains at a constant high -- and that balancing the need for security with allowing public access to a president is a persistent challenge. There is a "built-in antipathy" for every president regardless of party affiliation among some members of the public and advocacy groups, he says.With Obama, Jarvis says, agents assigned to the new president will feel an unspoken -- but increased -- pressure to shield America's first black chief executive. "I know agents are coming to grips with the fact that they have got to lay it on the line," he says.Wiley dismisses the suggestion of added pressure, saying that Obama's historic role is "one of myriad" security considerations. For months, Wiley says, officials have been overseeing the Inauguration Day roles of 58 federal, state and local security agencies, including the U.S. military.The Pentagon plans to deploy about 5,000 troops, a mix of personnel from every branch of service for both security and ceremonial purposes, according to the Armed Forces Inaugural Committee.In addition, Washington's police department is coordinating with 96 police agencies across the nation that are sending 4,000 officers to help secure the event, says D.C. police spokeswoman Traci Hughes.Burke says challenges include providing the large crowds with enough space to "appreciate the historical significance of the event," while maintaining a high level of security for Obama.Ray Mey, a former FBI agent who helped with security for the 1997 Clinton inauguration, says the crowds that gathered during the 2007-08 campaign and Obama's close interaction with them signal the new president will be "a tough guy to protect.""He likes to get out in the crowd," Mey says.The long election cycle and the enormous crowds at Obama's events already have stretched Secret Service resources. As a candidate, Obama began receiving Secret Service protection 1 1/2 years before the general election after congressional officials such as Sen. Dick Durbin, Obama's senior Democratic colleague from Illinois, expressed concern that the large crowds Obama was drawing could obscure a threat to the candidate.Durbin also told reporters in May 2007 that he was worried about the sharp rhetoric directed at Obama. Durbin, who did not publicly elaborate on the issue at the time, passed the information about the troubling rhetoric to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., who went to the Secret Service with Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., to share their concerns.This year, Secret Service Director Mark Sullivan told a congressional panel that the "tempo" of the campaign was "unlike anything we've ever seen before." Sullivan said the agency borrowed about 1,000 Transportation Security Administration officers to assist with screening at crowded campaign venues for all candidates.The early protection given to Obama and the large field of 2008 candidates could push Secret Service security costs well past 2004 levels. Sullivan estimated the agency planned to provide a total 739 days of protection for all covered candidates, relatives and former officeholders, costing about $44,000 a day for each person receiving protection. In 2004, the agency provided 454 days' worth of security.During the congressional hearing in April, Sullivan told the House Appropriations Homeland Security subcommittee, "We pay an awful lot of attention to the threats out there."Anxiety in DenverThat was the case when information emerged during a traffic stop before the August Democratic National Convention in Denver about a possible assassination attempt on Obama. An alarm was sounded that sent waves of anxiety from Colorado to Washington, D.C.Investigators quickly determined that the three main suspects -- initially feared to have ties to the violent white supremacist movement -- did not pose a serious threat to Obama.Yet the incident, as described by federal investigators, offers a rare glimpse two months before Inauguration Day of the intensity of security surrounding then-candidate and now President-elect Obama.In the months leading up to the convention, an estimated 500 FBI agents and 1,000 Secret Service agents were dispatched to the city. Weapons experts prepared for a bombing or other terrorist attack. Federal hostage negotiators planned for a host of crises.About 60 investigators from 20 local agencies in the region were assigned to gather intelligence about threats, including any directed against Obama, Denver FBI chief Jim Davis says. Teams of federal agents and local police rousted confidential sources in search of information."We weren't picking anything up," he says. "It was very quiet."That changed at 2:24 a.m. Aug. 24 -- the day before the convention started -- when a suburban Denver police officer stopped a blue 2008 Dodge pickup.A search of the truck, court documents show, turned up bullet-resistant body armor, wigs, two rifles with mounted scopes, walkie-talkies and a device that braces firearms for more accurate firing.Police relayed their findings to a federal intelligence center in Denver, which sent 100 investigators to the streets.The truck driver led agents to four other associates. One of them, according to court documents, told investigators that two of his colleagues had discussed a plan to "kill" Obama by setting up a high-powered rifle on a vantage point overlooking Invesco Field at Mile High, where Obama was to deliver his acceptance speech."Assuming that this was a credible plot, we had to ask ourselves: 'Do we have everybody involved?' " Davis says. "At that point, there was no degree of certainty that we had."Investigators pursued leads as far away as Kansas. Analysts used satellite technology to try to pinpoint possible locations from which a high-powered rifle could reach the speaker's podium.Yet, almost as quickly as the threat appeared, it began to "melt down," Davis says.Within 18 hours, interviews with the suspects and other investigative efforts revealed that none had ties to white supremacist groups. The alleged plot against Obama, agents concluded, was a product of apparent drug-induced bluster. The weapons and other suspicious equipment were related to the suspects' involvement in the methamphetamine trade.'Worrisome vitriol'Eight days before the election, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives said it had foiled a bizarre assassination plot against Obama by two men whom prosecutors said could have links to the white supremacist movement.The men, who were charged with weapons violations and making threats, allegedly planned a killing rampage that would have begun at a predominantly African-American school and ended with an attack on Obama.ATF spokesman Robert Browning immediately noted that the loosely organized plot raised questions about whether the suspects could have carried it out.Even so, former FBI agent Mey says Obama's election has the potential to reinvigorate the radical right, a mix of militia and patriot groups that thrived during the Clinton administration.In the wake of Obama's election, white supremacist leaders are claiming a surge in membership, according to the Southern Poverty Law Center, which monitors the groups' activities.While Obama was giving his stirring acceptance speech in Chicago on Nov. 4, former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke was rallying the white supremacist movement in a provocative call to action, saying Obama's election represented a "night of tragedy and sadness.""Barack Obama has a long history of antagonizing white people," Duke said in an audio message broadcast on the radical website Stormfront.org. "We as European Americans have to rally for our survival."Duke did not advocate violence, but Southern Poverty Law Center spokesman Mark Potok says Duke's message is part of the recent wave of "worrisome vitriol" directed at the president-elect."There is a real fury out there; a boiling rage," Potok says.Mey says security for this inauguration likely will be tighter than for any other -- including President Bush's 2005 inauguration, the first after the 9/11 terror attacks. For that event, fighter jets patrolled the skies over the capital, radiological sensors were located in the city's Metrorail system and Coast Guard units monitored the local rivers."I would expect (this) inauguration to be completely buckled down," he says.City under surveillanceDespite Washington's long experience dealing with large gatherings -- from Fourth of July celebrations and global summits to demonstrations on the National Mall -- Burke describes inaugurations as the "biggest challenges." Protection for visiting dignitaries, street closures and sprawling outdoor venues require a meticulously choreographed security operation.Since 9/11, Washington has installed a network of dozens of surveillance cameras that allow officials to more easily monitor multiple locations during major events.Mey says the camera technology is key to the security effort, adding a layer of protection to the thousands of officers in uniform and those roaming the crowd in plainclothes."You never really have it down to a science," Burke says of security planning.Jesse Jackson, a two-time Democratic presidential candidate who says his campaigns drew scores of threats, says the nation's "legacy of violence" requires a large security presence.Obama "must be careful," Jackson says. "He just can't be wandering into any crowds."Jarvis, the former Secret Service agent, says the risks brought to life by the 9/11 attacks and other tragedies, including the assassination of President Kennedy in 1963, are simply too great to dismiss."The consequences?" Jarvis asks. "Nobody wants to think about it."

Copyright 2008 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 

Red Hand Pointing Up
BACK TO TOP

Just Say No to Nosy Parkers in Executive Protection

Managing your Executive Protection business So we read that Julia Roberts doesn’t take regular showers and that word reportedly comes from a former bodyguard of hers.  If it’s true, it’s in the TMI category as far as I’m concerned but it does raise another point: confidentiality and the role of the bodyguard.  As a bodyguard you often get to see and hear far more than you probably care too but regardless, professionalism dictates that what happens on the job, stays on the job when it comes to disclosing client conversations or for that matter, client conduct.  Of course there’s a notable exception which is whenever you observe criminal conduct. You are under no obligation, professional or otherwise, to remain silent about criminal acts that occur in your presence. In fact, doing so might make you an accessory (consult a lawyer because this isn’t a post on legal advice).  What you do about it is an ethical challenge but professionally and legally there is no code of silence when it comes to criminal behavior. It’s those gray areas that tend to bring trouble and that can come from  keeping silent or running off at the mouth.I’d like to offer one one way of protecting your executive protection service or bodyguard service from a lawsuit with one simple act.  Require all of your employees, subcontractors, or independent contractors to sign a non-disclosure statement. You should back that up with a written and published policy statement in your employee handbook or as part of any contract with subcontractors or independent contractors.  Consult proper legal advice about what should be written in that non-disclosure statement, contract or policy manual to be sure what you are doing is legal. Some clients will require you to sign a non-disclosure agreement on behalf of your business but you should still have your employees, subs and independent contractors sign one as well.Drawing up a defensible non-disclosure statement costs money but it’s a lot less than getting sued.

baalex @ December 16, 2008

Red Hand Pointing Up
BACK TO TOP

Protective Security Considerations and the Press Conference.

As I watched the replays of the Iraqi reporter throwing his shoes at President Bush during the press conference in Baghdad I was reminded that even with the best and most thorough executive protection practices we are in an unpredictable business where threats can surface instantly. This incident left me with two thoughts.First, the Secret Service is as professional as any executive protection unit can be and leaves nothing to chance. Among their standard practices is a complete screening of every venue the President will step into or might step into. That screening process is multi-dimensional and uses both technical means and physical means. Everyone who gets into the proximity of the President, is going to subject to screening and some form of a search. Yet, despite that level of effort, the shoe throwing incident demonstrates that a determined attacker will be as resourceful as the Secret Service is determined. There’s a lesson here for all of us regardless whether we operate at the level of the Secret Service or for a small private executive protection element. Nothing can be left to chance and everything should be considered as a potential weapon.The second thought that came to my mind is the challenge of securing a press conference. On one hand, public officials should be accessible to the public which means inevitably, they will interact with the press at some point. Its not limited to public officials either. Celebrities too interact with the press on a regular basis. The nature of the press conference is an engagement with the public and that means close proximity is part of the engagement. Hence the challenge is to provide the requisite level of security yet still allow the press access to the principal. Even if every member of the press was required to be naked, there would still be a risk that a disgruntled member of the press would use his or her body as a weapon. Of course I’m exaggerating but my point is there has to be a balance between access of the press and executive protection.I’m also reminded by this incident of several incidents where attackers have used press conferences or the press itself as cover for an attack. For example, John Hinckley was positioned in a crowd of journalists. Hinckley used the press as a means of distraction to shoot at President Reagan. Ahmed Shah Masood, the leader of the Norther Alliance, was killed by two suicide bombers masquerading as members of the press. Recently the CEO of Microsoft, Steve Ballmer, had objects thrown at him during a press conference. The killers of Benazir Bhutto in Pakistan used the proximity of the press to gain close access to her as well.Take nothing for granted and assume nothing when it comes to the press. I am not advocating that the press be treated with any greater suspicion than anyone else but a bit

Red Hand Pointing Up
BACK TO TOP

The “Close Quarter Hold” as an Executive Protection Tactic

Richard Nance, an active Law Enforcement Officer, contributing writer to Officer.com and co-founder of Weapon Acquisition & Retention Tactics (WARTAC) has penned yet another article highlighting a defensive tactics technique with applicability to executive protection. While the gist of his article is aimed at Law Enforcement Officers performing more traditional police work,  his point on using a “close quarter hold” is valuable when it comes to bodyguard work.

Richard advocates transitioning to a close quarter hold in those situations when you are unable to holster your weapon while attempting to control a subject moving toward you. This is a very likely scenario for executive protection. Look at John Hinckley and his attack on President Reagan and you will see some of the responding agents and officers attempting to disarm and control Hinckley with their weapons drawn. As Richard notes, fighting with your handgun is a very real prospect particularly in an attack on principal (AOP) scenario. In close protection, the ability to take cover behind a barricade or other obstacle to “buy time”  doesn’t exist. “Just 2 Seconds” by Gavin DeBecker et al., illustrates the concept of using time and space to “defeat assassins.” In order to successfully capitialize on an attacker’s limitations of time and space as well as maximize on the limited time between attack recognition and response, both reactionary time and the effective application of gross motor skills is critical. The close quarter hold advocated by Richard Nance fits into that gap between attack recognition and response when the protector has already drawn his or her weapon. It’s a tactic that fits with the time and space limitations of an AOP. An AOP in the U.S. is more likely to consist of an attacker using a handgun and at less than 25 feet, the ability to execute a protective tactic that takes into consideration the limited amount of time the protector has to draw his weapon, acquire the attacker and shoot, a close quarter hold is an effective tactic.

BTW: Richard Nance has two excellent DVDs available with tactics that are appropriate for executive protection. Check out “Firearms Acquisition Tactics” and “Total Assault Protection”. 

Red Hand Pointing Up
BACK TO TOP

Managing Your Bodyguard Service
Managing your Executive Protection business

If you are an executive protection service or bodyguard service provider, you are in business first and executive protection second. In today’s troubled economic environment, managing your cash flow is paramount to your survival as a business. Even if you are an independent contractor providing personal security services, you still need to manage your cash flow perhaps even more stringently than a larger business.

One of the challenges of providing executive protection services, or bodyguard services in today’s poor economy is collecting from a customer who has gone bankrupt. Business Pundit, at www.businesspundit.com has five tips on how to protect yourself from bankrupt clients. Read this now before you find yourself trying to collect from a customer who can’t pay. It’ll save you time and more importantly, money in the long run.

 

Red Hand Pointing Up
BACK TO TOP

Why Executive Protection Should Fear the Suicide Bomber
Suicide bombers and the threat to executives

The Executive Protection community has already witnessed the implications of suicide bomber attacks against protected persons for several years. I don’t mean just the attack Benazir Bhutto, who’s death by a suicide bomber has had a profound impact on Pakistan and the region. We saw how effective a suicide bomber targeting a VIP could be with the attack on Raj Ghandi in the early nineties. We saw it and subsequently experienced when Shah Masood, the leader of Afghanistan’s Northern Alliance was killed by Al Qaeda operatives two days before 9-11 as part of the overall Al-Qaeda attack strategy for 9-11.

This disturbing report on Al-Qaida efforts to recruit children as suicide bombers contains at least two critical observation from the perspective of preventing suicide bomber attacks on VIPs. First, the authors note the tactical advantage a child possess operating as a suicide bomber. As female suicide bombers have demonstrated the world over, children would not typically rise to the level of suspicion, or perceived threat as the classic, but sometimes erroneous portrait of a male suicide bomber. This presents a real challenge when you look at options for tactically neutralizing a suicide bomber. How many of us are willing to make that call based on instinct alone?

The second element in this article worth noting is the three day stalk of the target by the child suicide bomber. One of the primary security concerns surrounding a suicide bomber is the bomber’s ability to adjust the attack based on a real-time assessment of security surrounding the target. If operational conditions don’t favor the bomber, the bomber has the ability to delay the attack or as demonstrated in the near simultaneous attacks that occurred against in hotels in Jordan, select another equally attractive target instantly. In the Jordanian attacks, one of the suicide bombers was turned away from his primary target yet he moved to another adjacent location and still managed to kill innocent people. While the bomber was not successful in achieving his goals at the intended target, the bomber still succeeded in creating casualties and achieving a victory in the form of creating the ensuing fear and publicity that terrorist attacks generate.

 

Red Hand Pointing Up
BACK TO TOP

Enter supporting content here